Bresat Cancer Update
Oncology Leader CommentarySpecial FeaturesPrevious Issues

Home: Oncology Leader Commentary: John F. Robertson, MD, FRCS

Click on the topic below for comments by Dr John F. Robertson to comment on. You will also find links to related articles and clinical trials.

Faslodex: Mechanism of action: Tissue effects
Side effects of Faslodex
Faslodex injection

Faslodex: Downregulation of estrogen receptor
Arimidex in premenopausal patients progressing on Zoladex
Zoladex plus Arimidex as adjuvant therapy
Arimidex versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy

Arimidex versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy

Interview with Neil Love, MD from Breast Cancer Update for Medical Oncologists, Program 4 2000

Play Audio Below:

Dr. Robertson: There are some reasons to hypothesize why, for example, an aromatase inhibitor, one of the 3rd generations, why they may be better than tamoxifen. I mean, you could imagine that tamoxifen eventually does end up as we know in cell culture, stimulating some of the cancers. And we know, too, that there’s a phenomenon of tamoxifen withdrawal responses. Whereas it’s difficult to hypothesize that an aromatase inhibitor eventually ends up stimulating the cancer. So there are some theoretical reasons to try and explain this new data we’re seeing in first-line therapy which suggests a 3rd generation aromatase inhibitor will be better than tamoxifen in hormone sensitive cancers.

Dr. Love: What about from a clinical point of view? When you put it all together do you think that they’re equivalent choices as first-line therapy or do you think that anastrozole is a better choice, both in terms of anti-tumor efficacy and side effects profile?

Dr. Robertson: I’d make one other caveat before I answer that question for you, which is that this is an initial analysis, and that there will be a later analysis with longer follow-up. The second caveat I’d make is that this does generate hypotheses that in ER-positive tumors an aromatase inhibitor is better than tamoxifen. And the other thing, which may support that and lend weight to the data that we now have, is the ATAC data. And if we see a benefit for the aromatase inhibitor in favor of the ER-positive subgroup, then that again would give us more confidence in this data for first-line therapy in advanced disease.

So, with those two caveats, I would say that on the basis of the information we have at present, it would seem that if you were going to treat a patient you would start them on anastrozole rather than tamoxifen. But, I don’t think that that’s data which you can say could never change, because there’s more information to come on a second analysis with more follow-up and also from the ATAC study. But at the moment, I think in ER-positives, anastrozole is a better drug than tamoxifen.

Top of Page

Home · Contact us
Terms of use and general disclaimer