You are here: Home: BCU CME | 2005: Editor's Note
 
     
 

The enclosed audio program contains highlights from two case-based daylong CME meetings our group hosted for medical oncologists in Los Angeles and New York City. Like all of our live events, the primary purpose of these gatherings was for us to interact with physicians in practice to better understand their education needs.

To better accomplish this goal, we commonly utilize an innovative wireless “chat room” setup that provides each attendee with a portable computer throughout the event. This allows participants to continuously provide input to our faculty panel, but even more importantly, it encourages them to pose questions that are usually answered by investigators as part of the meeting or typed in the chat room. Below, find a sampling of the most common queries and comments that emerged, many of which are discussed in the enclosed program.

— Neil Love, MD
NLove@ResearchToPractice.net
January 10, 2006

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant endocrine and monoclonal antibody therapy
How do you approach endocrine therapy in patients with chemotherapy-induced menopause?
In the absence of randomized trial data, please comment on the use of adjuvant tamoxifen versus an AI with goserelin in premenopausal patients.
It is recommended that tamoxifen not be given at the same time as adjuvant chemotherapy; is the recommendation for AIs different? Can AIs be used concurrently with radiation therapy?
Is there any value in administering an AI for two years and then switching to tamoxifen?
Is tamoxifen dead for postmenopausal patients?
A lot of the safety benefit of an AI is based on decreased gynecological symptoms. Is the toxicity profile of an AI better for women who have had a hysterectomy?
Should an AI be used in the treatment of DCIS instead of tamoxifen? Are we justified in using anastrozole as chemoprevention for patients at high risk for breast cancer?
Was it the weight loss or the decreased fat intake that led to the reduced breast cancer relapse rate in the WINS trial? Why were the benefits seen mainly in the patients with ER-negative disease? Is there any reason not to believe that a low-fat diet might be beneficial to patients with other types of malignancies?
Should the impressive results of the WINS trial of dietary fat reduction be discussed with patients at this point? If we had seen these results in a study in which patients took a drug to achieve this, we would have seen a lot more excitement about them.
Do aspirin or statins decrease the risk for stroke or MI in patients receiving anti-estrogen therapy? For a patient with an adverse lipid profile and osteoporosis, which aromatase inhibitor do you use?
Do you use the Oncotype DX in your patients? Is it covered by insurance?
What do you recommend for osteoporosis prevention when using an AI, and at what point do you stop the AI based on a change in bone density?
If a woman already has osteoporosis before starting anastrozole, what is your choice of bisphosphonate for her?
If you switch from tamoxifen to an AI after two years, do you continue the AI for three years or five years? Can a patient be at low enough risk of relapse not to switch to letrozole after five years of tamoxifen?
Has anybody looked at the use of COX-2 inhibitors in patients with letrozoleinduced arthralgias? Perhaps this, rather than the altered lipids that letrozole-induced, contributed to the high incidence of cardiac death in the BIG study.
Are the musculoskeletal side effects the same with all AIs? In other words, if a woman is taking one AI and not tolerating it due to these symptoms, might she do better with another AI? Why do AIs cause these symptoms?
How often do you measure bone density in patients who are on AIs? Do you put them on bisphosphonates and calcium supplements if they have osteopenia?
Would cardiac echo be more accurate than a MUGA scan in determining LVEF in patients on adjuvant trastuzumab? How about adding a cardioprotective agent?
Is it reasonable to use dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab?
What is the difference between AC followed by paclitaxel/trastuzumab and AC followed by docetaxel/trastuzumab? Does docetaxel/trastuzumab result in less cardiac toxicity?
Do you give adjuvant trastuzumab weekly or every three weeks?

Would you use trastuzumab as part of neoadjuvant therapy in which the nodal status isn’t assessed pathologically? If so, would you look at something like PET to assess the axilla?

What is the explanation for the high incidence of brain metastases in women on trastuzumab? Is this due to blood-brain barrier issues or the development of resistant clones?

How reliable is IHC for assessing HER2 status? When must we use FISH?

Close monitoring of cardiac function is recommended for patients receiving trastuzumab and chemotherapy. In fact, monitoring neither prevents nor predicts congestive cardiomyopathy; it merely confirms it.

What medical options are available for the woman with HER2-positive breast cancer who demonstrates declining EF while on trastuzumab?

 

Systemic therapy for metastatic disease
The ECOG-1193 study shows no advantage to combining paclitaxel/doxorubicin. However, this does not mean other combinations are not superior. There is little reason to think AT would be superior (no synergism, overlapping toxicities, inability to administer full therapeutic doses in combination). On the other hand, a rationale does exist for regimens such as DC and GT.
One of the goals of chemotherapy for metastatic disease is palliation. In general, response (or control of disease) is associated with palliation. As combination regimens have higher response rates (and better control of disease), one can assume they will be associated with better palliation too.
Are data available on gemcitabine/capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer?

Does anyone use the European approach of starting capecitabine at full dose but closely monitoring the patient during capecitabine administration and reducing the dose in the middle of a cycle?

The cost of capecitabine is an issue for patients because many do not have prescription coverage and are ineligible for patient assistance programs. This is a common reason for patients preferring IV chemotherapy to capecitabine despite physician recommendation of capecitabine.

Some California senior-care HMOs cover only generic forms of oral medications, and for both capecitabine and etoposide, no generic form exists, and they are not covered. This is an excuse. Are there any recommendations for dealing with this issue?

We make a big fuss about the lack of crossover design in many chemotherapy trials for metastatic disease. However, for other tumor sites (eg, colon, lung), combination therapy is the standard, with no crossover design studies.

Sometimes when we change the dose of capecitabine, pharmacists see the prescription for 14 days given every 21 days, and either the patient or the pharmacy seems to be confused as to how many pills constitute a “30-day supply.” Also, if we have prescribed 500-mg tabs and want to change to the smaller-dose tabs halfway through the month, we have difficulty doing this because preauthorization from insurance companies takes four to five days or longer if they require a dictated note to make any changes.

What would your choice of therapy be for patients who had received AC/paclitaxel/ trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy and then relapsed after one year? Would you re-treat with trastuzumab-based therapy or go to antiVEGF-based therapy?

A main reason for continuing trastuzumab beyond progression is the preclinical synergism between trastuzumab and many chemotherapy drugs. Do any preclinical data show that tumors that become resistant to trastuzumab still benefit from continuing trastuzumab?
Does the degree of HER2 amplification matter? Isn’t positive just positive?

What is the role of tumor markers, bone scans, CT scans, etc, in the routine follow-up of breast cancer? NCCN has issued guidelines, but are they being followed?

Has capecitabine been combined with weekly paclitaxel in any studies? Do you think this regimen would make any difference compared to three-weekly paclitaxel in terms of efficacy and safety?

Is there a rationale for combining fulvestrant with an AI? Do any preclinical models show synergism?
Is there an optimal dose and/or schedule for fulvestrant? Should patients be “loaded” with a loading dose?
What is your first choice of hormonal therapy for the premenopausal patient with metastatic, ER-positive disease?

 

 
 
 
     
 
 


 
Editor’s Note:
Common questions about breast cancer from oncologists in community practice


Case 1: An active 79-year-old woman with a 7.5-centimeter, Grade II, ER/PR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with lymphovascular invasion and three positive nodes (from the practice of Dr Martha A Tracy)

- Select publications

Case 2: A 41-year-old premenopausal woman with an ER/PR-positive, HER2-positive infiltrating ductal carcinoma and six positive lymph nodes (from the practice of Dr Herbert I Rappaport)
- Select publications

Case 3: A 68-year-old woman with disease progression 10 years after presenting with hormone receptor-positive diffuse metastatic disease to the bone (from the practice of Dr Ghaleb A Saab)
- Select publications

Case 4: A 91-year-old woman with dementia who was diagnosed with Stage II, ER-positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer 15 years ago and now has diffuse bone metastases (from the practice of Dr Juliann M Smith)
- Select publications

Case 5: A 41-year-old surgically postmenopausal woman with a 3.5-centimeter, ER/PR-positive, HER2-positive tumor and two positive lymph nodes (from the practice of Dr Herbert I Rappaport)
- Select publications

Case 6: A 45-year-old premenopausal woman with a 0.7-cm, ER/PR-positive, HER2-positive tumor with 25 percent high-grade DCIS and an Oncotype DX™ recurrence score of 16 (from the practice of Dr Steven W Papish)
- Select publications

Case 7: A woman who presented in 1989 with an infiltrating lobular carcinoma and 21 positive nodes and was treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen and then develops metastatic disease and is treated over the next 11 years with a variety of chemotherapeutic and hormonal agents (from the practice of Dr Pamela Drullinsky)
- Select publications

Case 8: A 35-year-old woman with a 3.5-cm, ER/PR-positive, HER2-positive infiltrating ductal carcinoma and two positive sentinel lymph nodes treated on the nontrastuzumab- containing arm of the Intergroup N9831 trial (from the practice of Dr Pamela Drullinsky)
- Select publications

 
CME Information
Faculty Disclosures
Editor's Office