About BCU CME Meetings Special Editions Meet The Professors Patterns of Care Conference Partnerships Patient Projects Other Tumor Types About us
You are here: Home: BCU 1 | 2009: Howard A Burris III, MD

Tracks 1-20
Track 1 Efficacy and side effects of the HER2 antibody-cytotoxic drug conjugate T-DM1
Track 2 Case discussion: A patient with trastuzumab-refractory, HER2- positive mBC who experienced a durable, near-complete remission with T-DM1
Track 3 Rationale for continuation of biologic therapies upon metastatic disease progression
Track 4 Forecast role of T-DM1 in the clinical algorithm for HER2- positive mBC
Track 5 Pertuzumab: A first-in-class HER dimerization inhibitor
Track 6 Tolerability and side effects of orally administered TKIs
Track 7 Pilot study of adjuvant AC arrowpaclitaxel/sorafenib in patients with high-risk BC
Track 8 Clinical trial experience with weekly and every three-week T-DM1
Track 9 Lack of cardiac toxicity associated with adding bevacizumab to three docetaxel-based adjuvant regimens: TCH, AC arrow docetaxel and TAC
Track 10 Cardiac monitoring of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy/ trastuzumab
Track 11 Typhlitis associated with anthracycline/taxane regimens in combination with bevacizumab
Track 12 Role of adjuvant docetaxel/ cyclophosphamide (TC) for early BC
Track 13 Use of Oncotype DX for patients with node-positive, ER/PR-positive early BC
Track 14 Pathologic CR rate and SPARC tumor correlatives from a Phase II neoadjuvant trial of gemcitabine, epirubicin and nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab) paclitaxel
Track 15 Lack of steroid premedication and hypersensitivity reactions with nab paclitaxel
Track 16 Mechanism of action of the epothilone analog ixabepilone
Track 17 Rationale for TITAN: A Phase III trial of adjuvant AC followed by ixabepilone versus paclitaxel for triple-negative BC
Track 18 Potential role for bevacizumab in the treatment of triple-negative BC
Track 19 Capecitabine with or without ixabepilone in triple-negative BC: Pooled analysis of two Phase III trials
Track 20 Paclitaxel/bevacizumab as first-line therapy for patients with mBC

Select Excerpts from the Interview

Tracks 1, 4

Arrow DR LOVE: You are coauthor of a study presented at San Antonio on trastuzumab-DM1 (T-DM1). Can you comment?

Arrow DR BURRIS: I was a skeptic about the idea that a cytotoxic agent could be linked to an antibody, retained with the antibody and then delivered to the cancer cells. We have tried this a few times through the years without success. In T-DM1 the cytotoxic agent is mertansine. Maytansine was the parent compound, and this is a derivative. We knew that the maytansine compounds were extremely active but too toxic. With T-DM1, we did not see pancytopenia, hair loss or other classic toxicities associated with maytansine. However, we did observe transient changes in platelet counts, which were probably an immunologic effect.

In the Phase II trial, the median time on prior trastuzumab was approximately 76 weeks, and the response rates to T-DM1 were 30 to 40 percent among patients with previously treated, HER2-positive metastatic disease (Vukelja 2008).

Arrow DR LOVE: Where do you see T-DM1 heading?

Arrow DR BURRIS: T-DM1 is moving forward, and I believe that in a year it will be utilized as second-line therapy. The data from this study are so promising that a randomized trial (NCT00679341) has recently been initiated comparing T-DM1 to trastuzumab/docetaxel as first-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic disease.

Track 9

Arrow DR LOVE: Would you discuss your group’s study headed by Denise Yardley evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to three different docetaxel-containing adjuvant regimens?

Arrow DR BURRIS: The idea was to take the docetaxel-containing regimens that were becoming standards — such as TCH (docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab) — and add the VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab. The goal of our trial was to provide safety data for the BETH study and other trials.

We presented preliminary results at ASCO 2008 (Hart 2008), and the report at San Antonio was a follow-up confirmation. We treated 75 patients with bevacizumab in combination with the following regimens: TCH, AC docetaxel or TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide; Yardley 2008a; [3.1]). With TCH and bevacizumab, the main concern was cardiac toxicity. We didn’t have any problems — only two of 75 patients showed declines in their ejection fractions (Yardley 2008a).

As we proceed into adjuvant trials with bevacizumab, the results improve with regard to cardiac toxicity because nurses and doctors are becoming internists and are treating hypertension. We no longer have hypertension problems with bevacizumab because we administer ACE inhibitors and diuretics earlier.

Tracks 14-15

Arrow DR LOVE: Would you discuss your neoadjuvant study presented at the 2008 SABCS meeting?

Arrow DR BURRIS: The neoadjuvant trial involved an aggressive regimen of gemcitabine in combination with epirubicin and nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab) paclitaxel administered as a dose-dense, every other-week approach.

Our pathologic complete response (CR) rate in the breast and lymph nodes was 18 percent. These were patients with initially unresectable or difficult to resect tumors (Yardley 2008b). This was an interesting result. We used pegfilgrastim support, and the toxicity was manageable. We also evaluated the patients’ SPARC status, and a trend toward a higher pathologic CR rate was recorded among the patients with SPARC-positive disease (Yardley 2008b).

Arrow DR LOVE: What benefits do you believe nab paclitaxel provides?

Arrow DR BURRIS: Not having to use steroids is attractive, particularly for patients with diabetes or other preexisting conditions. The second benefit is being able to administer the drug without fear of a hypersensitivity reaction. They’re uncommon, but in a busy clinic such as ours, we see one every few weeks.

Arrow DR LOVE: What about the potential for increased efficacy?

Arrow DR BURRIS: In the trial comparing it to paclitaxel in metastatic disease, the response rate and time to progression were better (Gradishar 2005). In Bill Gradishar’s follow-up randomized Phase II study, weekly nab paclitaxel appears to carry a preferential advantage compared to docetaxel (Gradishar 2007; [3.2]).

Select Publications

Table of Contents Top of Page

BCU Think Tank

CME Test Online

Home · Search

EDITOR
Neil Love, MD

INTERVIEWS

Harold J Burstein, MD, PhD
- Select publications

Jack Cuzick, PhD
- Select publications

Howard A Burris III, MD
- Select publications

Mark D Pegram, MD
- Select publications

 

Breast Cancer Update:
A CME Audio Series and Activity

Faculty Disclosures

Editor's Office

Media Center
PDF
Media Center
Podcast
Previous Editions
Home Terms and Conditions of Use and General Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2009 Research To Practice. All Rights Reserved